- TINYMEDIAMANAGER HANGS ON UI MOVIE
- TINYMEDIAMANAGER HANGS ON UI PORTABLE
- TINYMEDIAMANAGER HANGS ON UI TV
If EMDB doesn’t fix the ugly soon, then I’m going to try Kodi again.Īs for HomeCinema, I looks like it needs more work, but I’ll give it a try.Īmong those that manage data and allow you to play with your default player are: TinyMediaManager whose v3 is completely free and functional but from version 4 includes the primiun version and the free one in my opinion is so limited that it is useless, that’s why I stay with v3 that receives updates to fix bugs, although not of new features. Also, the dev is a bad technical writer, which becomes very confusing for us users who don’t understand half-baked babblefish. It wouldn’t take much to make EMDB look great, but the dev “likes it” that way.
There are theme and color choices, but they are limited and all ugly (IMO). Also, when the program updates, it goes back to that ugly GUI/theme. I hacked my version to look modern/sleek, with a dark modern theme, but it was a hassle to do. In fact, all of EMDB is dated looking, circa 2K.
TINYMEDIAMANAGER HANGS ON UI MOVIE
Also that “glow” when you select a movie is ugly. I use it with MPC-BE.Īs for those cover frames, yes, those look ugly and dated. You can also set EMDB to play when you click a cover in the bookshelf view. Personally, I’m fine with using those smaller covers, which look fine on my 50″ TV, where in my bookshelf view I have it set at 6 rows across. AFAIK, under edit, if you try to enter a larger poster, EMDB will shrink them to the “cover” size, which is used in the bookshelf view. In the options for EMDB, you can set it to fetch quality movie posters, but those are just used for the Poster view, which is bacially just a slideshow (yawn).
TINYMEDIAMANAGER HANGS ON UI TV
Personally, I don’t like the TV Mode view. After testing it though, I didn’t like it, and stayed with EMDB.ĮMDB was just updated with a new TV Mode view, which you might like, but the posters are still small.
TINYMEDIAMANAGER HANGS ON UI PORTABLE
So I don’t understand why you take the virtustotal so serious, antivirus/malware and all that are usually a waste of resources and a way to spy on people since they upload “samples” to improve a X engine.Īnd yeah, it is good to check what you are downloading and installing, but there are million ways to confirm if something is malicious or not and not only use the virustotal as evidence and then stuck with it, especially when we talk about 2 engines “SecureAge APEX” and “MaxSecure” (did you even hear of them before virtustotal?) from is likely your best choice, and the last time I checked (2 years ago), you could be made to work in a portable mode. 2, seriously? not even when it is 20 you should take virustotal as the only reason to dismiss something as “malicious” sometimes they get flagged because of the way they are packaged and so on.įor example, Process Hacker has virtustotal scanning and it even shows WacomHost.exe having 1|74, so it is a malicious program? I don’t know which one would flag a wacom product as malicious but for whatever reason it does, and it only shows how useless most antivirus/malware are… Well, even ProcessHacker process gets flagged for like 7 engines because I have to guess it is not signed…
0 kommentar(er)
